Over 80 per cent of local authorities have reported that pavement parking is a widespread problem in their area.
The findings of the most recent government consultation on pavement parking confirmed that vulnerable pedestrians are most at risk, and in particular: people with visual impairments; people who use mobility aids, including guide dogs, wheelchairs, and mobility scooters; young children and people with prams and pushchairs.
A review of surveys carried out by organisations representing disabled people, as well as cycling and walking provided evidence of pedestrians being injured or very nearly injured, because of vehicles parking on pavements. The surveys indicated that 95% of visually impaired people had had a problem with vehicles parked on pavements in the previous year. This figure rose to 98% of wheelchair users. A survey found that 32% of respondents with vision impairments were less willing to go out on their own because of pavement parking.
Pavement parking also has a negative financial impact on local authorities with one estimating that 10 to 20% of its pavement repair budget of £500,000 is spent repairing pavements damaged because of pavement parking each year.
The reluctance of government to deal with pavement parking may be due in part to lobbying by the motoring lobby. The AA described talk of a nationwide ban on pavement parking as ‘a step too far’ and a recipe for parking chaos. However, campaign groups are determined to see a change in the law.
To help keep the topic on the news agenda, we devised a fictional device designed to be installed along kerbs that quickly punctures tyres.
Catclaw is the size of half a small orange and was designed to be installed in its thousands along kerbs and pavements. When a car or lorry drives over a CatClaw, its weight exposes a sharp steel tube that quickly punctures the tyre. However, it poses no threat to pedestrians – a person standing on top of the device would not be heavy enough to activate it.
If a car mounts a pavement fitted with Catclaw, it’s tyres are quickly and efficiently burst
The Catclaw is an extreme idea that is unlikely to be practicable, or even legal. Other than the sharpened spike hidden within, what, you may ask, is it’s point. The purpose of the project is to highlight the plight of the 43 people killed last year on pavements in Britain by drivers and the many thousands of pedestrians every day who have their path blocked.
The Catclaw allowed us to talk at some length about the need to radically alter the way we tackle road danger in all its forms. The project appeared on television and in The Daily Mail, The Express, The Mirror, Metro, The Manchester Evening News and been viewed over 135,000 times on YouTube.
The systematic approach to road danger reduction Britain so badly needs will not involve Catclaw or anything remotely as outlandish. As has happened in countries such as Sweden, it involves placing needs of people ahead of cars. The benefits are numerous, but include safer roads, reduced healthcare costs, greater independence for children and increased quality of life for all. However, change of this kind can occur only once people – as opposed to politicians – consider it vital. And that process starts with getting it talked about. Please watch the film we made about road danger and share.
With the exception of London – where a ban already exists – only lorries are currently prevented from parking on pavements. The solution to pavement parking isn’t endless consultations, public information campaigns or silly gimmicks, it’s a simple change to the law to allow local authorities to enforce the obvious: Pavements are for people.
Ethical insurance
The work of the ETA ranges from awareness-raising projects like the Catclaw and the documentary film above, to community roadshows promoting sustainable transport and helping schools mount protests to demand safer road crossings.
Supporting these projects is easy. Simply buy your home insurance, cycle insurance and breakdown cover and you will be helping to fund these projects and many more besides. And you can rest assured that by choosing us you will not be compromising on quality or paying over the odds – we’ve been around for over 30 years and are rated as Britain’s most ethical choice by The Good Shopping Guide.
Vincent Edwards
What goes around comes around….. in 2001 a Select Committee reported in favour of a ban on pavement parking. I wrote to my MP inviting him to support their recommendations. A few weeks later he replied, enclosing a letter from the Minister of Transport. He said it would be “too dangerous” to ban pavement parking so the government wasn’t going to do anything.
Twenty years later we have another Select Committee report with broadly similar recommendations (though with an acceptance that in some areas pavement parking will continue). But will anything change? Scotland has introduced London-style legislation (though it is not yet in force). Wales is to transfer enforcement from Police to local authorities, though without changing the confusing law on obstruction of the highway – not sure how that will work out. And the government in England appears to be looking for ways to avoid doing anything.
What a pity action wasn’t taken twenty years ago when the problem, though serious, was less severe than it is now. Just how bad does it have to get?
Mavis Wild
What would I give to have a big bagful of catclaws!
I have a wheelchair and a scooter and frequently have to use the road when I cannot get along the pavement.
It is very tempting to scratch the side of the vehicle but instead I have printed some polite notices to go on to the car.
Doug M
There are some fairly narrow side roads in the Edgware and Wembley areas of Greater London where parking with two wheels on the pavement is compulsory! There are white boxes marked on about half or the pavement width, and I know that residents in Edgware were actually fined for parking on the road, before they even knew of the regulation!
David McArthur
Despite all the publicity on this issue of pavement parking – and the likelihood of a nationwide ban – motorists still have this sense of entitlement and are either oblivious or uncaring of the dangers to pedestrians. I was walking my small dog on the pavement when I heard a large car behind me, the driver had taken advantage of a drop down pavement to mount the kerb. I turned, the driver drove at least twenty yards on pavement – and still had further to go to arrive at chosen parking point. The car was too close for comfort, I pulled on the dog’s lead and moved myself and dog out of harms way. The car was now alongside me, the driver – a middle aged woman – mouthed the words “Thank you” through her car window. She clearly believed I had moved myself and dog to make room for her car when I was in fact taking avoiding action. I spoiled this “happy” meeting by myself mouthing the words, “Jesus ******* wept. From behind her side window the astonished woman responded “What”?